Korea Business Central Exclusive Interview - Amy Jackson, President of AMCHAM Korea, "Making Korea a Better Place to Do Business"

The Korea Business Interview Series:

"Making Korea a Better Place to Do Business"

with Amy Jackson, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Korea. Amy is leading efforts to promote the interests of foreign companies in Korea.

Click the button below to hear our exclusive interview (approx. 37 minutes length):

To listen off-line, right-click here to save the .mp3 interview file to your computer.

Tom:Hello, and thanks for joining us today at KoreaBusinessCentral.com. My name is Tom Tucker. I'm the host for our ongoing interview series with movers and shakers when it comes to all things pertaining to business in Korea.

My guest today is Amy Jackson. She is the President of the American Chamber of Commerce in Korea where she has lived for seven years. Previously, she worked for the Office of the US Trade Representative and was the Deputy Assistant US Trade Representative for Korea.

She also previously accumulated 15 years of experience working with the United States government at NASA where she negotiated space deals with Japan and, overall, she's been working with Korea since 2002.

Amy, great to have you. Thanks for joining us today.

Amy:Yeah, thank you. It's a pleasure.

Tom:Just real quickly, tell us what is the American Chamber of Commerce in Korea? Tell us about it. What is it and what do you do?

Amy:The American Chamber of Commerce in Korea is the largest foreign chamber in Korea. We have almost 2,000 individual members and about 1,000 corporate members. And what we do is promote US/Korea trade and we try to act as a bridge between the US business community and the Korean public and private sector.

So, we try to help our members thrive in the Korean marketplace, but we also try to explain what Korea is like today to the US public and mostly government officials.

Tom:So, how did you come to your position as President of the Chamber in Korea and what are your impressions of the job now? Especially since you've been on the job now for seven months as I understand it.

Amy:That's right. I spent a lot of time in the US government working on Korea issues. At the Office of the US Trade Representative, I led bilateral discussions and negotiations with Korea in the trade realm and the lead up to the launch of the Free Trade Agreement.

And that was an issue in many sectors; pharmaceuticals, autos, insurance, other financial services, education, different issues related to food. And I got very interested in the Korean market and very impressed with Korea and how dynamic its economy is, how forward-leaning Korea is.

So, when this job came open, I was really excited to be able to have the opportunity to come here and head the American Chamber.

Tom:What is it about Korea that you find most compelling, most interesting, most exciting. You mentioned it briefly, just the dynamic nature of the marketplace. What else drew you to Korea?

Amy:I spend a lot of time working with Japan and Korea and people always ask me to compare, and I think one of the most striking things is the ability of Korea to change. When Korean policymakers, or the Korean private sector, or even Korean citizens think something is in their best interest, they're happy to move on a dime and embrace some new idea or go in a new direction. And it's really evident here.

As I said, I started working with Korea in 2002 and have been back and forth to Seoul many times a year and coming to live here, I've seen so many changes. Cheonggyecheon is the beautiful park downtown where families can go and it was a major project of Lee Myung-bak's when he was Mayor of Seoul.

You see all kinds of new construction here. You see new foreign businesses thriving here and you really feel it in the atmosphere I think. That's one of the things that has struck me since I've actually come and lived here.

Tom:The chamber in Korea has a reputation as one of the best run Chambers of Commerce in Asia. Why do you think that's the case?

Amy:I'm very glad that it has that reputation. That was my impression of the Chamber working with the Chamber when I was in the US government and that's very much thanks to my predecessor, Tami Overby, who held this position for many years.

I think one of the major accomplishments of the Chamber over the last many years is the fact that it has been able to move from somewhat, if I can call it, cable pounding organization to a much more partner-focused organization and what that has done is that it's opened a lot more doors to us.

So, we come and present issues and concerns and problems to our Korean counterparts both in the private sector and the public sector, but we try to do it in a cooperative, behind-the-scenes fashion and we have gotten a lot better results doing it that way; a lot more doors open to us. When we ask for meetings, we typically get them and we get a lot of consideration of our views from our Korean counterparts.

Tom:In your opinion, what are the top three things that the American Chamber of Commerce in Korea had achieved for American companies, say, over the last ten years or so?

Amy:Oh, I would say that is one of them -- moving the organization from America cable pounding focused organization to one that has spent a lot more time building the bridges because we consider ourselves a bridge between the US business community and Korea.

And so, we've had a lot of success in, as I said, having a much more cooperative open door relationship, particularly with Korean government policymakers.

Another major triumph I think is the US-Korea Free Trade Agreement. Who would have thought five years ago that there would be a US-Korea Free Trade Agreement? Who would have thought that Korea would have a Free Trade Agreement with the United States before Japan?

AMCHAM was one of the key promoters of this FTA both in its initial stages before it was launched and all during the negotiations. And now, trying to get it passed, we still are really out in front of this FTA because we believe it's in both countries' interests and both countries' business communities in interests.

Tom:Right. How about another achievement for American companies in Korea? Anything else?

Amy:Actually, at the end of 2008, after a long protracted lobbying effort, we -- the American Chamber of Commerce -- was very instrumental in getting Korea on the Visa Waiver Program. This has had both concrete economic effects for our travel and tourism member companies because there are so many more visitors now going from Korea to the United States.

But also, sort of for the halo effect of just underlying the positive relationship between the US and Korea in all realms, not just in the military or the political realm, also the economic realm and showing Korea that they are an important partner to the United States, from A to Z, I think it has a really positive effect on business here.

Tom:I'd say that's the case. Let's talk about our course a little bit more, the Free Trade Agreement. That, obviously, is probably the number one task for AMCHAM Korea over the next couple of years. I imagined that that would be the case, yes?

Amy:Yes, absolutely.

Tom:And so, why is this important? What impact is this going to have for business between Korea and the United States once this gets approved?

Amy:Well, I could go on and on, but I'll try to be a little a bit succinct in my answer. We, the American Chamber of Commerce, but also many businesses and people in the United States and Korea view the Free Trade Agreement between the United States and Korea as a third pillar in our relationships.

So, we have a very strong political relationship, a very strong military geo-strategic relationship. We feel that this needs to be underlined with an equally strong economic pillar. Both countries have done economic analysis of the benefits of the FTA to their economies, and at a time when both countries are still working to come out of the global economic recession are very focused on jobs. This is an agreement that will bring jobs to both countries.

On the US side for example, the International Trade Commission estimated that there would be an immediate boost of $10-12 billion of US exports. Korea also has -- and I don't remember the figures off the top of my head for them -- an immediate boost.

So, this will benefit industry across the board, help promote foreign direct investment in each other's countries and further export from Korea to the US and the US to Korea.

Tom:So, which AMCHAM Korea member constituencies would you say stand to gain the most from the passage of KORUS?

Amy:I think the vast majority of my members will benefit from KORUS and that's why the American Chamber is such a strong supporter of it. Not only do Free Trade Agreements cover tariff reduction -- I mean, that's a huge portion. Hundreds and hundreds of pages of the FTA's dedicated to what tariff is going to come down to what level over what period of time. So, certainly, people who are selling goods can immediately benefit from this.

But, there are also chapters in the FTA that cover investor rights. So, anybody who's an investor in Korea or any Korean company that's an investor in the United States automatically gets better protection. Intellectual property rights is a big chapter in the Free Trade Agreement. And so, anybody who wants to protect intellectual property in the Korean market or vice versa in the US market will find very strong protections.

One of the key parts of the -- I'll call it the unsung hero of the FTA -- is the regulatory transparency chapter. That is one of the key issues my members face in the Korean market. The fact that still -- although we have made significant progress -- still, too many rules and regulations are changed without enough involvement of stakeholders, without enough notice, without opportunities to comment.

The US-Korea Free Trade Agreement has a very expensive chapter that deals with that to a pretty significant degree of detail -- how, when, in what cases, when regulations are changed. There needs to be a much more transparent process that does allow stakeholders to input. That will help anybody who's working in this market whether they'd be an American company of another foreign company or a Korean company.

Tom:So, what is the Chamber doing to push this process forward and what can members and also non-members do to support the passage of KORUS?

Amy:AMCHAM does a door knock on Washington at least once a year. Since the Free Trade Agreement was negotiated, I think AMCHAM has averaged about three times a year visits to Washington to meet with senior policymakers in the Administration and also key members of the Congress to help personally.

I think AMCHAM member stories are the most compelling because we are the people who are working on the ground here. We see what the Korean economy is and is not like every day.

Unfortunately, I think a lot of American policymakers are ill-informed about what Korea is like today. Their image of Korea is back in the 1980s and the differences between Korean, the general way policy has made the way they embrace competition now, it's such a stark contrast from now and 20 years ago that it's really important that people who are on the ground here in Korea go to Washington and do this kind of advocacy.

So, we are about to head out. We're going in mid-May and, again, we will be meeting with key policymakers in the Obama Administration and key members of Congress to talk about the importance of the FTA and importance of early passage of it.

Every time Congressional delegation comes to Korea or Congressional staff delegation comes to Korea, we meet with them, we sit down with them. We talk to them about, again, what's it like on the ground here, where there been significant positive changes, where there are still issues and really strongly advocate for early passage of the Free Trade Agreement.

Tom:How do you expect the passage of the Free Trade Agreement to unfold and when do you think it's going to take place?

Amy:Yeah, that's a big question. For me, the best case scenario -- I don't think there's any real possibility that the Obama Administration is going to take up this or any of the other pending free trade agreements before the mid-term elections in November.

My hope, and the best case scenario, would be as soon as those mid-term elections are over -- remember, Obama will be coming here for the G-20 about a week later. He will be meeting with President Lee and I hope he comes with a very detailed plan of action that he can share with President Lee about the submitting the agreement to the Congress for consideration at the end of the year and an early vote. That's my hope.

Tom:Certainly something, I'm sure, many people are going to be looking forward to. Other than lobbying for the Free Trade Agreement, you I'm sure have other major goals that the American Chamber is working toward right now. What are a couple of these other goals that you guys are focused on right now?

Amy:I think both Korea and the United States are very interested in and committing a lot of resources to green growth. And we have many companies here who are interested in exploring partnerships with Korean companies to develop new Green Growth technologies that can be sold in both of our countries, but also around the world.

And so, we have an energy and Green Growth committee that's been very active. It's already written up a position paper and presented it to Korean authorities. We are having active discussions with Korean government and private sector officials on areas in which our countries and companies can work together in the green growth areas, so I think that's going to be a big area of focus for the rest of the year.

Also in the area of green growth, I think all countries around the world have to be careful that as they develop new green growth policies --we're talking about recycling, packaging, labeling, those kinds of things that we don't put in to place; new policies that could have ill-intentioned consequences.

So, for example, I understand that there was a new packaging law put into effect in Korea sometime ago for a certain type of product. It said, "You can only put two layers of packaging on it, not three," and this is in order to save the environment.

But, what happened to certain American companies who are selling that product here, they had this reroute their product to Singapore, unwrap it, throw away the extra wrapper, rewrap it and send it to Korea which was a total waste for the environment because it cost extra fuel, extra money -- you can imagine.

So, I think we, the American Chamber of Commerce, will be working really closely with our companies and with Korean authorities to make sure that as these policies are introduced that there's enough stakeholder involvement so that we can make sure to avoid those kind of ill-intended consequences. So, we will be spending a lot of time on that.

One other area is the Korean biopharmaceutical sector is a sector in which the Korean government has designated it as a sector of growth for the Korean economy. This is an area in which we have a lot of interest and expertise. We have so many innovative pharmaceutical companies really cutting-edge biotechnology that's coming out of the United States right now.

So, the American Chamber of Commerce is also going to be spending a lot of time working on forging new partnerships between our biopharmaceutical sector and the Korean biopharmaceutical sector, and we're going to kick it off.

We're about to announce that we're having a big seminar on July 1st that will talk about promoting innovation in the Korean biopharmaceutical sector. We'll be having lots of speakers coming from the United States and, hopefully, Europe. And we're going to be partnering with Korean Authorities and the public and private sector and exploring ways in which we can cooperate and help Korea advance its goals of becoming a leader in biopharmaceuticals. So, that's a few key areas of focus for this year.

Tom:Sounds terrific. Let's talk about your members a little bit. I'm sure your members are a diverse lot and I know it's probably hard to pin them down to simple categories, but if you were to break things down a little bit, can you tell us a bit about the types of companies and individuals who benefit from membership in AMCHAM?

Amy:One of the things I've been surprised about since I came here is that people who are not American don't think they can be part of the American Chamber of Commerce. That's totally wrong.

We have so many Koreans who work for American companies. More and more are beginning to participate in the Chamber and we welcome them, but we also have Korean companies. Our charter encourages membership from anyone who is involved in US-Korea Trade.

So, our membership runs the gamut of nationalities but it also runs the gamut of very large companies, manufacturing companies, small companies, service providers. It really is a diverse group. There's no one segment that dominates over other segments.

Tom:So, beyond the advocacy of issues, such as the passage of Free Trade Agreement, what unique value offerings does the AMCHAM membership provide for those who become members?

Amy:I think the feedback that I get from the members is one of the things they really appreciate is the opportunity to network, so they can meet other companies that either do similar things that they do or have similar problems or similar issues that they're facing.

Some of our members have been in country for a long time. Some of our members are Korean; very good to get advice from some of the Korean managers that some of the US business folks who are based here can meet with.

We also have about 30 active committees that are broken down by sector, but also sort of by theme. So, we have a Human Resources committee, we have a taxation committee, and we have a legal committee.

And those committees invite speakers or we have a human resources seminar that we do annually that we did about two weeks ago that a lot of our members like to go to because we try to pick themes of issues that are common across companies doing business in Korea, whether they're American or Korean, and deal with them as difficult issues related to human resources.

Similarly, the taxation committee tries to deal with new tax policies that are coming up that might present some difficulties or confusion in trying to get the Korean authorities in charge of them to come speak to the committee and clarify issues or convey concerns about these new policies.

Those kinds of meetings cut across all sectors and can be important information for big companies or small companies, but we also have the thematic committees. We have aerospace and defense committee, we have a pharmaceutical medical devices committee, etc. So, for our members who are in a specific sector, they also have the resources that are provided in those committees.

What we try to do in the committees is have relevant speakers, deal with timely issues, but also if there are issues of concern, we -- through our committees -- submit papers to relevant Korean government officials to try seek change or try to seek clarification of new policies that are coming up that might be of concern; so very active.

We advertise for our companies. There are a lot of ways that companies can do that. We have a journal, we have a membership book. We meet frequently with individual members to talk about what their issues are and help give them some advice on experts in country to reach out to. That's some of the list of what we do.

Tom:Certainly sounds pretty comprehensive. At what point does the US company become big enough that membership in AMCHAM actually makes sense and, further, can individuals join and participate or is it only for companies?

Amy:It's absolutely not just for companies. We have a lot of company members, but we also have a lot of individual members. So, we welcome both and I think we try to run our meetings and our committees, and also provide certain benefits that will appeal to everyone, not just our larger corporate members.

Tom:So, can you maybe give us a couple of examples of maybe some small companies that are really thriving within AMCHAM and what are they doing that's helping them get so much value from their membership?

Amy:It's interesting you raised that point. When I got here, we, AMCHAM did not have a small what we called an SME -- small-medium enterprise committee -- and some of my members came to me soon after I got here and expressed a strong interest in launching ones.

So, we have launched our SME committee. We are hoping that that committee will provide specific schematic issues in their committee meetings and get specific speakers that will appeal more to a smaller company audience.

One of the things we do as a membership organization, we also try to promote the services of some of our smaller company members. Some of them are Human Resources experts, some of them are consulting firms. They have a lot of unique expertise that they can provide both to our US and other foreign company members, but also to our Korean company members. So, we really try to encourage that kind of networking, but also cross use of each other's services within the Chamber.

Tom:Alright, that certainly sounds great. Let's change the focus here a little bit and talk about the business climate in Korea. Korea has a reputation as one of the most difficult markets in the world for foreign companies in which to do business. Do you agree with that?

Amy:I think it used to be that way. I think it can still be very difficult to do business in Korea, but it doesn't have to be. I think, in many areas, Korea is changing and addressing some of the concerns that the US and other foreign businesses have presented to them.

Again, the regulatory transparency; that issue, the idea that when rules and regulations change, policymakers who are changing them need to reach out to stakeholders and get input, and I think we've seen a significant change.

Some ministries here more regularly reach out to the business community, the foreign business community and seek input before they implement new policies. We're seeing that. There are still some ministries that are behind and need a lot more work.

And so, if you're an industry that relies on one of those ministries that still is somewhat closed, business can still be very difficult here, but I think in many other areas, there's been a significant improvement.

And also, a commitment at the highest levels of this government to embrace competition in the marketplace, to adopt international standards. That's one of the pledges that President Lee made when he came into office that was very well received by the US business community. The fact that President Lee said, "I want international standards. I want to get away from Korea unique standards." And I think we're seeing a change in that direction and that's very helpful.

Tom:From where said, what are some of the other main challenges facing American companies in Korea?

Amy:Fierce competition; that's for sure. Korean products continue to gain in visibility, popularity, quality. Korea is an economic powerhouse and it's going to be really prominent on the international stage this year with Korea hosting the G-20, with how amazingly successful Korean athletes where in the recent Olympics now presently has offered to host the next Nuclear Summit here.

I think you're going to see a lot more of Korea on the international from and I think you're going to see a lot more competition from up and coming Korean companies.

Tom:Some people would say that doing business in Korea somewhere between the chaos of China and, let's say, the orderliness of Japan. Do you think that's a fair characterization? Why or why not?

Amy:I know the Japanese markets really well. I'm not as familiar with the Chinese market, but it sounds a pretty apt comparison to me.

Tom:Yeah. So, how would you compare the business climate in Korea with the business climate in some of these other Asian countries? Can you give us an assessment there?

Amy:Yeah, I think, again, Korea is an extremely dynamic economy. One of the only countries OECD countries that's growing quickly after the global financial meltdown. So, you're seeing such dynamic activity in the Korean economy and focus on new industries to promote, focus on encouraging tie-ups between Korean companies and foreign companies. You're not necessarily seeing that kind of dynamism in some of the other Asian economies.

Tom:What are some of the other unique characteristics of the marketplace in Korea compared to some of these other Asian economies?

Amy:Well, earlier I talked about ability to change. That's very meaningful that if you see you're doing something that's not getting you the results that you want. Korea is so much more adept at adapting quickly and embracing a different way of doing things or a different approach.

You don't see that so much, for example, in Japan; the unfortunate incident with the Toyota vehicles and the recall, I think is a call to action for all multinational businesses. My sense here is that Korea's really watching this case and learning now about what pitfalls to avoid because they have their major stake in the United States and other markets around the world and they don't want to see this kind of thing happen to them in the future. So, really fast adaptability is one of the big differences here.

Tom:In our recent poll at Korea Business Central, 35% of respondents listed bureaucracy and non-tariff barriers as the biggest obstacles to foreign investment in Korea. I think we touched upon these issues briefly earlier. Would you agree that these are the top two issues that foreign companies are facing in Korea today?

Amy:I would add one more and that would be labor. On the positive side, the Korean workers are known to be among the most productive, dedicated, well-educated workers in the world. So, that is very attractive to foreign investors.

But, on the other hand, some of the violent strikes that happen here, for those of us who live here, understand that they are not the norm. They're still well-publicized around the world.

When I was in Washington, that was front page a year or so ago and that leaves a bad impression for possible investors, but also the fact that labor so inflexible here. It's so difficult to hire and fire based on the success or lack of success of your company. That's a big hurdle for doing business here.

Tom:So, when it comes to these hurdles, how is the Chamber getting involved in terms of lobbying the Korean government to improve some of these issues?

Amy:We talk about it all the time with everyone who will listen.

Tom:I'm sure you do.

Amy:Yeah.

Tom:So, can you give specifics though on your work with the Korean government to address these things?

Amy:Yeah. For non-tariff barriers, again, one of the key non-tariff barriers is regulatory transparency. So, we try at every opportunity when we hear of a rule or regulation that is being introduced that could inadvertently hurt trade.

There have actually been some new rules that have been proposed that would cut off trade entirely in a certain industry or sector between the United States and Korea. Whenever we hear about those, we immediately go into Korean authorities and talk about what the issues are and how the proposed rule or regulation can be changed to still achieve the goals that the Korean government are trying to achieve, but without the disruptive elements of trade.

There are other kinds of non-tariff barriers and, again, those are high on our agenda to try to work with Korean authorities to make sure that those do not impede trade. Those are not even introduced if we can get them in an early enough stage. So, we spend a lot of time both me, personally, but also my staff every day working on those kinds of issues.

Tom:Can you talk a little bit about the way you impact and influence the Korean decision making process with the government there? Can you talk about your influence? How do you go about it and do you feel like you're effective? Why or why not?

Amy:One of the unique things under the Lee Administration is there is a Presidential Council on national competitiveness. It has been in existence under various names for leaders before President Lee, but President Lee is the first one to invest his own personal time in it.

So, this council meets, basically, monthly and looks at issues of competitiveness in the Korean economy. So, every month they have a couple of different issues they talked about -- deregulation of financial services sector; you name it.

AMCHAM has been asked to participate in that as a member of this council. So, this is a very important opportunity for us at the very highest levels to provide our views and opinions on some of the key issues that Korean policymakers are dealing with.

So, we have access right at the top which is a really unique feature of Korea. I don't think many of my counterparts around the world have that kind of access to leadership, but also a really important opportunity to interface at the highest levels on issues of concern.

But, we also have general membership meetings at least monthly and we try to get leading speakers from the US government and the Korean government and the private sector. We recently had the Minister of Knowledge Economy. We have asked the Prime Minister to come speak to our membership. So, that's also another opportunity to talk to key policymakers about issues. But, as you know, working with Korea you can't just do top-down, you have to do bottom-up as well.

So, at our committee meetings, we very frequently invite Korean policymakers at the Director, the Deputy Director, Director General level to come in and talk to us about things that are coming down the pike or things that are developing new policies so we can ask our questions where there are things that are unclear and we can provide comments.

But, we also work, as I said, regulatory transparency -- I feel like I'm the queen of transparency -- but we really push hard when we hear new policies are being developed. We push the bureaucracies really hard to put these things out for public comment which is the practice around the world. And when they do put it out for public comment, we work with our committees to provide public comments. So, AMCHAM frequently comments on proposed rules and regulations.

Tom:Well, that's great. It sounds like you guys are doing a lot of terrific work and good for you. I'm sure the members certainly appreciate everything that you, and your staff, and your colleagues are doing.

To conclude, our visit today as the head of the leading US business organization in Korea, I'm sure you've learned quite a bit about doing business in Korea. In a nutshell, what are three practical recommendations about business in Korea that you would like our listeners to take away from our conversation?

Amy:I think joining in the American Chamber of Commerce is a really good idea because we do provide a lot of infrastructure, knowledge, and networking opportunities to help businesses succeed here.

You mentioned earlier that some of your -- I don't remember whether you said it was a poll or not, but that some of your members have talked about Korea being one of the hardest places to do business.

If you're coming in cold with an American mentality, it can be very difficult to do business here. So, you need to reach out to expertise. You need to reach out to organizations like mine. You need to reach out to business people who have done business here for many years who can give you pointers.

But, they're also all kinds of support services you can get here whether it be through legal consultants, human resources people, etc. who can give really good advice about how to do business here. So, my strongest piece of advice is do your homework and reach out to the people who can help you succeed here.

Tom:Certainly sounds like great advice. Anything else you'd like to share in closing?

Amy:Oh, no. It was really a pleasure to talk to you.

Tom:Yeah, great job, Amy. It was a pleasure as well for me and I'm sure it will be for our listeners to hear your thoughts as well. We've been visiting today with Amy Jackson, the President of the American Chamber of Commerce in Korea.

Amy, thanks a lot for the visit today and we'll certainly look forward to touching base with you in the future. I wish you great luck and success in all that great work that you're doing there.

Amy:Thank you very much.

Tom:Okay. Thanks, Amy. Take care.

Amy:Yeah, bye.

Tom: Bye-bye.

Views: 103

Reply to This | 이 글에 답하기

Replies to This Discussion | 이 토론에 대한 답글들

Great interview! Amy makes interesting points about the significance of the non-tariff barriers that foreign companies face when doing business in Korea. Unlike tariffs, these issues that might not even exist in theory, but in practice can make doing business in Korea very challenging. It will be interesting to see how the FTAs affect these aspects of the business environment here and if they will really be able to level the playing field for foreign companies.
I like that Ms Jackson mentions transparency and reaching out to appropriate stakeholders at numerous points in her interview.

Of particular interest to me was her mention of an event planned for the beginning of July on the topic of biotech cooperation. Based on her introduction of the topic, I suspect she may not realize the US is the originator and undisputed leader in this industry with the world's two largest biotech firms headquartered in California. My Korean government institute, among other activities, is helping Korean (and other Asian companies) develop the products that will compete directly with existing US biotech products. I am very interested in knowing more about the upcoming event in Seoul and perhaps participating. At this time, no upcoming events are listed on the Amcham Korea website.

http://www.amchamkorea.org/news/upcoming_list.jsp

I will be investigating joining Amcham Korea. Thank you for presenting this interview, Steven!
While I do not know the details of the biotech meeting that Amy mentioned in her interview, I believe she would be referring to a presentation to Korean industry by a group of US private sector and govt representatives.

I have been involved in similar types of meetings when I was in AmCham Singapore and AMCHAM Malaysia, mainly relating to the pharmaceutical industry and providing Asian government officials and local pharma companies with background on the US pharma industry, its views on IPR-related issues (e.g., data exclusivity, patent linkage, etc.) We organized briefings which featured independent consultants who were well-respected internationally in the pharma industry, USPTO (US Patent & Trademark Office) representatives, and others from various industry bodies.

Often where the US is grappling with challenges in international markets that are affecting the ability of American firms to do business (i.e., non-tariff barriers, market access difficulties), these types of briefings are a way to help educate international partners on the US' perspective on certain areas. An important part of these briefings is also to look at helping to develop regulatory or other measures in those countries which will help further growth and development of Asian companies so that they can sell their products into the US. These meetings also seek to develop a more level playing field for US firms in overseas markets.

Biotech is huge now, with many Asian markets looking to become hubs in this area. A meeting such as this might be aimed at providing American stakeholders of a better understanding of Korea's plans on how it will further its biotech industry, and to share similar US industry updates with Korean partners. However, an important focus of these types of meetings is usually on regulatory areas and market-access issues, to ensure that companies in both the KR and US markets can engage each other. Discussions could also involve ensuring things like IPR protection are a hallmark of continued growth in both countries.

Often, US' partners in other countries are not aware of the role Congress plays in regulatory aspects of doing business in the States. Briefings like this can be a way for US parties to share with their international counterparts details on the US legislative process and what Congress looks out for. Certainly on KORUS and with other US-Asian FTA discussions, much educational work had to be done to show local partners why the US negotiators were pressing on certain issues or procedures, because much of this was linked back to how Congress would review pending FTAs.

Again, I do not know specfics of the July workshop, but from my past AMCHAM experience, I believe it might touch on areas and topics as I have noted above. I don't think it is a question of AMCHAM not recognizing the US as being the world leader in the biotech industry (as they do), but it is more about how to look at helping Korea further its biotech industry that would result in long-term mutual benefits and growth for both Korean and American biotech companies in the respective markets.

It would definitely be worthwhile for you to join AMCHAM. As is common across all AmChams in Asia, they have substantial interest and involvement from local- and 3rd-country companies who are members. I believe being able to represent your Korean clients in these types of discussions with FDA, USTR, and other relevant US govt agencies will definitely benefit you and help get you a direct line to key US policymakers, with whom you and your clients can talk to ensure their interests are represented (and if they need help with any potential US regulatory areas that might be hindering their expansion into the States).
Thank you for your detailed response, Dom.

Amcham's biotech committee seems to have been recently dissolved. Perhaps I can help get it rolling again. And I definitely remain curious about July's meeting.

Because of the strong regulatory requirements in the pharma industry, biotech companies in Korea are acutely aware of US congressional legislature. In particular, all eyes are focused on the upcoming legislation that will provide a regulatory pathway for the development of so-called "bio-generic" drugs, typically described in the industry as "biosimilars". Korea was one of the early creators of a regulatory pathway for development and licensing of these products. Companies in Korea have produced biosimilars for sale domestically and they are very interested in entering the US market. The founding biotech companies in the US are working to extend their patents and keep biosimilar competition out of the US market. However, there are US companies developing their own biosimilar products. Thus, the net impact of opening the biosimilars market and it's effect on overall US industry is not clear. It will be very interesting to see how this situation evolves...
I would add a sidenote that what makes AMCHAM Korea spectacular is the people who work there.

The Chamber has a tremendous, high-energy team who are extremely sharp. They also run one of the best and most competitive internships programs of any AMCHAM in Asia. Several years ago, I had an opportunity to spend time with the staff and interns, to learn about the Chamber's operations, so that I could benchmark it for my own AMCHAM in SE Asia.

It was incredible to see the types of projects the interns were working on. If companies are in need of great talent, they only need to look as far as AMCHAM's Executive Offfice, and I believe that every intern picked would do tremendously in their future careers.
Great job Amy! AMCHAM's recent initiative to support SME will benefit those looking at Korea and members of KBC.
A great interview with excellent insight. One note --- it is also, and at times equally, difficult for Korean companies to do business in Korea. Thus, for Korea's economy and its local/foreign constituents to make further progress, the next area for making improvements will be to uplift Korea's government global competitiveness. In other words, it would be great to see Korean government workers' role (attitude, mindset & behavior) change from "ruling over" its citizens (investors, general public and corporate entities) to "facilitating and aiding" the growth of its citizens (investors, general public and corporate entities) on fair terms to achieve real G20 status.
Daniel - let's wait and see what will be the next (ongoing) success formula for globally competitive businesses in Korea in a forever changing world.

My main point was to emphasize that by having a more globally competitive, streamlined and consumer-friendly government everyone doing in Korea will benefit. Hence, making Korea a better place to do business - in relation to this great interview (nothing more, nothing less).

On a peripheral note, and as I am strong advocate of protecting civil liberties; I cannot actively support an individual's abuse of power within government (your and/or mine). My apologies to you (for not having the same monotonous thought as you) along this front.
Hi Mike,

Through my work, I routinely interact with government agencies who's mandate is to support Korean business development overseas. In my experience they are quite limited in their abilities to provide useful service for this objective. Although I have no direct data to back this up, I suspect the main reasons for this are lack of training and functional management in their organizations. There's little real attention or care applied in their efforts and the results show this. I now send my subordinates to the meetings they arrange, if we attend at all. Regardless of where Korea was in the past relative to where it is today, there's a lot of room for developing these government agencies into efficient and productive organizations, worthy of G20 status.
Vince's observations are spot-on, but this is not necessarily unique to Korea; it is a situation which you will find across many countries' civil services, including in their business development and economic development agencies.

There can often be a number of reasons for this, which can include:

1. The civil servants are career government and might not have had much firsthand exposure (i.e., little or no real-world experience) in the private sector. This can be a big problem in countries where industry complains that university grads are not prepared to enter the workforce, as they are being taught technologies and concepts which are 3-5 years behind what is really going on (often that is because their professors are not going out to the private sector to see firsthand what is happening).

2. In many countries where there is not a history or culture of government lobbying, govt agencies are not hearing from the private sector about what they are doing well, where the govt needs to invest more money and time, etc. You will see routinely in most Asian countries that foreign investors who are from Western countries that have very strong "government educational activities" (i.e., lobbying cultures -- especially in the States), will often be the main stakeholders talking with government.

3. Vince alludes correctly that this skills gap in some govt circles is often as a result of lack of training and functional management support. That is why groups like AMCHAM and others will put on briefings (such as what Amy noted in her remarks), as a way to educate their government partners about the latest things in the private sector and how this relates to the companies' FDI projects in the host country. In the process, they are seeking to help build (further) the industry knowledge and skills of the government officers with whom they will be working.

I believe the way to improve on this (not only in Korea, but in all countries) is:

a. Develop an environment in the govt agencies which fosters external engagement by the officers -- i.e., get them out from their desks and into the field to meet companies and see/understand what they are doing, where things are working well, and where they need the government's help.

This is particularly critical for governments who want to develop certain sectors by bringing in huge companies, but have not considered the underlying supply chains that must also be developed, having sufficient numbers of graduates educated in those subjects, etc.

b. Cross-train officers not only in a functional/industrial area, but also give them geographic responsibilities for particular markets/countries.

c. Dedicate particular govt officers to a group of companies, so that firms have a "go-to guy/lady" in the agencies with whom they develop a very close relationship.

d. Governments should consider working with companies to provide matching grants (i.e., 50% from govt and 50% from the company) to setup secondments -- bringing company execs into govt offices for 6-8 months, and to send their officers into those companies for similar periods of time. This will serve to give officials from both public- and private-sectors exposure to what the others are doing, resulting in a better understanding and closer working relationship (as well as exposing more broadly the cutting-edge market research and technologies, and what govt needs to do through legislative and fiscal means, to help the industries continue to flourish).
Below is a link (from the Korea Herald) that provides a solid example of where Korea can improve, and an example of where government (judicial branch) is not living up to consumer (taxpayer) expectations. These prosecutors, if they are found guilty, should be very shameful. Their mentality is that they live above (or rule over) the common person -- this means that they think that they can get away with illegal acts (or live above the law) since they are the prosecution agency; and the existing custom is not to prosecute another prosecutor as they all belong to the same and one "elite" inner-circle who have passed Korea's national bar examination.

http://www.koreaherald.com/national/Detail.jsp?newsMLId=20100427000775

Many other examples of where government agencies are not globally competitive can also be found elsewhere. Let's just hope that Korea's government will soon be able to respond to the challenges of becoming globally competitive as some of Korea's businesses have successfully done; and also make Korea a great place to do business for local and international investors alike.

Such (reported) news in local media is positive indication that Korea is now headed in the right direction. Many years ago, such an event would have been treated very differently; and perhaps not even reported to the general public.
I agree. The latest news stories show that the government is serious about dealing with corruption and is surely making progress. I'm sure it'll be a long process, but things are certainly headed in the right direction.

In fact, I overheard some Korean suppliers to one of the chaebol talking recently that they aren't able to bribe the chaebol middle managers anymore like they used to...

RSS

Download the KBC Korea Business Library The Best 47 Free Korean Business Resources to Improve Your Results in Korea

(We hate spam just as much as you and guarantee to never sell or give away your email address.)

Get more information about the KBC Korea Business Library.

Feedback, ideas, suggestions or questions about KBC? Click here to share your thoughts with KBC Creator Steven Bammel.

© 2012   Created by Steven S. Bammel.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service